Legal Opinion
Martin v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1985No. Nos. 80-1273, 80-1274, 80-1284, 80-1295, 80-1297, 80-1316, 83-1448 and 83-1449PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is based on a class action filed on behalf of all present and future youth offenders who have been or will be confined at the Federal Correction Institute at Milan, Michigan pursuant to the Federal Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 5005-5026 (repealed October 12, 1984, Crime Control Act, § 218(a)(8), 98 Stat. 2027).1 The parties have raised four issues on appeal. First, the plaintiffs argue that the Parole Commission’s use of convictions that have been “set aside” under the YCA violates 18 U.S.C. § 5021. Second, the plaintiffs contend that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Mohamad AbushaarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Louise Compton v. The Tennessee Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Timothy J. Adams v. O.J. Keller, Commissioner and the U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wail Ahmed v. University of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Johnson v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Johnson v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985