Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 18, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

Petitioner, applying pro se, moves for an order directing the Clerk of this Court to refund the fifteen dollar fee paid under protest for filing motion 68 Civ. 4574 under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, or in the alternative directing the Clerk to refund ten dollars of the aforesaid fee. Motion denied.

Petitioner asserts two grounds for relief: First, that the Clerk erred in requiring filing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, rather than pursuant to Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., of his motion to vacate and set aside sentence. Second, that the Clerk is not authorized to charge fifteen dollars for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  2. Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API