Legal Opinion

Barth v. Rosenfeld

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1872PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. A statement of the case is contained in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBowie, J.

This case originated in a bill of interpleader, filed in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City on the 14th of April, 1870, by Samuel' H. Cover, against Samuel Barth, the appellant, James T. Smith, and Eosenfeld & Oettinger, the appellees, charging that the complainant held, as auctioneer, certain funds in which he had no interest, which were claimed by the defendants adversely to each other, for which he had been sued by the appellant, and which had been attached by the appellees as creditors of one McDowell, and which he, the complainant, prayed leave to pay into Court, and that the *609defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayhew v. SoperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1839

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Hopkins v. Easton National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Chase v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API