McDonald v. Karpeles
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 103, April T., 1915, by defendant, from order of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1914, No. 2474, discharging rule to open judgment in case of M. W. McDonald, agent now for use of Aphonse Tritsch and Philomena Tritsch, y. Emanuel Karpeles. Rule to open judgment. Before Evans, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The judgment in this case was entered under the war*497rant- of attorney contained in a lease executed by W. M. McDonald, agent, to the defendant. The lease was subsequently assigned to the use-plaintiffs who acquired title to- the property. Immediately before the making of the lease the property was in the possession of Bowers. The defendant was about to purchase the latter’s business and as a preliminary to that transaction wished to obtain a lease for five years for the property occupied by Bowers. The defendant with Bowers and one Goldstein Avent to the office of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tracy v. . Albany Exchange Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Cairns v. LlewellynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stetler v. North Branch Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Stein v. ReisingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Lancaster Malleable Castings Co. v. DunieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- McDowell v. Henry German Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Dattolo v. Stevenson and IdaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.