Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Novasecku

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided September 12, 1949No. 464Published

1Opinion of the Court

Neely, J.,

This is an action of trespass brought into this court on defendant’s appeal from judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff by an alderman in the City of Harrisburg. Defendant, in accordance with our rule of court 111, gave written notice to plaintiff by registered mail, stating that the appeal had been taken and filed to the appropriate term and number, and further notifying plaintiff that “you must file and serve on the defendant, or his attorney, a statement of your cause of action within fifteen (15) days after the receipt of this notice”. When no such statement was filed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Castle Metal Products Co. v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Koenig v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Kerr v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. McIlhaney v. HollandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Lentz v. Kittanning Real Estate Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API