Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Grace
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
The proceedings before the chancellor presented an issue of fact upon which the evidence, heard orally before the court, was in sharp conflict. As to whether or not, under these circumstances, the ruling corresponds with the opinion of the appellate court as to the weight of the evidence, is not the question of controlling importance, for due consideration is to be given the advantage the chancellor has enjoyed of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify and observing their demeanor upon the stand. Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738. The well-established rule therefore by which this court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Curb v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Wiegand v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Watson v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Ray v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- State v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Farmers Ginners Cotton Oil Company v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.