Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Bolles

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceedings upon probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

EgglestoN, S.—

Among the numerous objections urged by the contestants against the probate of the last will and testament of Viola A-. Bolles, deceased, late of Cortland, N. V., are the following:

First. That' the will offered for probate was not legally and properly executed.

Second That at the time of the making and execution of the will the testatrix was not of sound mind and was not competent to make a valid will.

Third. That the will was procured by fraud and undue influence practiced against and upon the testatrix by Frank Inger-soll, Sarah Ingersoll and Fred D. Ingersoll, or some one of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. In Re Proving the Will of MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament & Codicil of BogardusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. In re the Estate of HallNew York Surrogate's Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API