Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Pruyne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 13, 1975PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In this rear-end automobile accident ease, the trial judge, on defendant’s motion, ordered that a new trial on damages be had unless John Sweeney, plaintiff herein, consented to a reduction of the $37,500 jury verdict in his favor to $20,000. On appeal by plaintiff, 1 the Appellate Division held that the order for a remittitur was error and reinstated the original jury award. The matter comes to us by virtue of a dissent in the Appellate Division.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion, but add the following. This Court has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. TAWEEL v. Starn's Shoprite SupermarketSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Maiorino v. Schering-Plough Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Amaru v. StrattonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API