Lay v. Great Southern Lumber Co.

The issues in this case, in my judgment, have been presented to the jury under instructions which fairly state the law for both parties, and the verdict of the jury should not be disturbed. The theory of the appellee and its proof tended to show that appellee, the Great Southern Lumber Company, owned and operated a lumber business about five miles from the city of Columbia, and that its entire plant, including many houses and so-called “ear houses,” was situated on land belonging to the defendant, and constituting the general lumber camp of the defendant; that, among other things necessary…