Geiselman v. Wise
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The single, decisive question requiring the consideration of the court is presented by the first ground of the demurrer challenging the sufficiency of the operative facts alleged. In other words, conceding the truth of the somewhat meager factual allegations in the plaintiff’s amended petition, is a cause of action stated?
A study of the plaintiff’s briefs discloses that he relies chiefly upon the decision of the Court of Appeals of Monroe county in the case of State, ex rel. Fulton, v. Loar. In so doing he apparently has overlooked the fact that the questioned conveyance in that case was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Raymond Cecil Schmelzer, Bankrupt. Danny A. Cesner, Trustee-Appellant v. Raymond Cecil Schmelzer, Bankrupt-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Lakeshore Motor Freight Co. v. Glenway Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Gilbert v. Castor (In Re Castor)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989