Legal Opinion

Gullo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1973No. 72-498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge.

The appellant was arraigned and pled not guilty. He thereafter filed his motion to suppress as evidence all tangible items of property and other evidence seized from him. At the conclusion of testimony on the motion, and argument of counsel, the trial judge denied the motion.

Following the denial there occurred a conference between the assistant county solicitor, the assistant public defender, the judge and the appellant, in which the plea of not guilty was changed to a plea of guilty as charged, the following colloquy in the transcript:

“MR. NAGEL: . . . and I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. State v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Reddick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Urquhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Adler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Helms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API