Legal Opinion

Blanford v. Haynie

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 23, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02880Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Keith Warrick Blandford, ) C/A No. 2:20-2880-RMG-MHC ) Plaintiff, ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Vv. ) ) Will Haynie and John J. Tecklenburg, ) ) Defendants. ) ee) This is a civil action filed by Plaintiff Keith Warrick Blandford, a pro se litigant. Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (1) a Second Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Will Haynie, ECF No. 44 (“Haynie’s Motion”), and (2) a Second…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Garcia Jay Wright v. George Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Dr. Berry Officer Larry DonnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API