Legal Opinion

RW Rine Drilling Company v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1972No. 44851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

This action to review an award of compensation benefits entered by the Industrial *1170Court presents a question of first impression which is whether the result of a blood sample taken from the driver of an automobile, under the authority contained in 47 O.S.1971 § 751 et seq., is admissible in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in view of the last sentence contained in Section 752 of 47 O.S.1971. The result of the blood sample and analysis for alcoholic content therein was refused admittance in evidence by the trial judge under the exclusionary wording referred to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flint Construction Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. JH Rose Trucking Company v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. In Re BargerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poole v. Earp Meat Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Yeager v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. RW Rine Drilling Company v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Yeager v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API