McCormick & Fisher v. Local Unions 216
Ohio Circuit Courts
Appeal. Cited and commented upon the following authorities: Martin, Labor Unions Sees. 30, 35, 40, 55, -28, 29, 69, 72, 74, 75, 76, 82, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 95, 96, 100-102, 106 ;• Plant v. Woods, 176 Mass. 492 [57 N. E. Rep. 1011; 51 L. R. A. 339; 79 Am. St. Rep. 330]; Berry v. Donovan, 188 Mass. 353 [74 N. E. Rep. 603; 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 899; 108 Am. St. Rep. 499]; Gray v. Trades Council, 91 Minn. 171 [97 N. W. Rep. 663; 63 L. R. A. 753; 103 Am. St. Rep. 477; 1 Ann.
Read the full summary
Appeal. Cited and commented upon the following authorities: Martin, Labor Unions Sees. 30, 35, 40, 55, -28, 29, 69, 72, 74, 75, 76, 82, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 95, 96, 100-102, 106 ;• Plant v. Woods, 176 Mass. 492 [57 N. E. Rep. 1011; 51 L. R. A. 339; 79 Am. St. Rep. 330]; Berry v. Donovan, 188 Mass. 353 [74 N. E. Rep. 603; 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 899; 108 Am. St. Rep. 499]; Gray v. Trades Council, 91 Minn. 171 [97 N. W. Rep. 663; 63 L. R. A. 753; 103 Am. St. Rep. 477; 1 Ann. Cas. 172]; Booth v. Burgess, 72 N., J. Eq. 181 [65 Atl. Rep. 226]; Jonas Glass Co. v.' Glass Bottle Blowers’ Assn. 72 N. J.…
1Opinion of the CourtWildman, J.
The plaintiffs, owning and operating as partners the Grand Hotel on Adams street in this city, and in connection therewith a saloon and restaurant, in May, 1910, became involved in a dispute with the defendant associations named in the title of the case, which are voluntary unincorporated labor organizations, and officers of the same. The trouble arose over the retention in the service of the plaintiffs of certain bartenders, members of the defendant unions, after request of those organizations that they be discharged from the plaintiffs’ employment because they were in default for their dues…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Warner v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1934