Legal Opinion

Srogi v. Cahill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Memorandum: A city charter, “like any other statute, must be read as a whole and in such a way, if possible, to make it consistent and harmonious.” (Matter of Richmond Rys. v. Gilchrist, 225 App. Div. 371, 375.) Section 4-104 of the Charter of the City of Syracuse empowers the council ito override a veto of an ordinance by the Mayor, with the only restrictions being the need to act by two-thirds vote and within 30 days of the Mayor’s veto. On the other hand, section 6-102 (4) (e) (1) apparently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond Railways, Inc. v. GilchristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Donnelly v. SheaNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potter v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Culinary Institute of America v. Hyde Park Fire & Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API