Randel v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant insists that we erred in concluding that the substitution of one judge for another during the trial of his case did not operate to deprive him of the right of trial by jury as guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of this State.

Appellant challenges the correctness of our conclusion that the record affirmatively reflects he agreed to the exchange or substitution of the judge.

The record has been again examined upon this question, and we remain convinced of the correctness of our original finding.

Whether appellant did or did not…