Legal Opinion

Siek v. Siek

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The motion is to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is for the annulment of the marriage of the parties upon the ground of fraud. Upon such a motion, only the complaint is before the court. The merits of the action cannot be passed upon and speculation may not be indulged as to what the proof may show on the trial. The allegations of the complaint must be taken at face value and every intendment and fair inference must be in favor of the pleading. (Dyer v. Broadway Central Bank, 252 N. Y. 430;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Madole v. GavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API