Bliey v. City of New York

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated February 6, 2004, which denied his motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue a prior motion to vacate the dismissal of this action, which had been denied by order of the same court dated March 18, 2003.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Although denominated a motion for leave to renew and reargue, the plaintiffs motion was, in actuality, a…