Legal Opinion

In re the Appointment of a Conservator of the Property of Huffard

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

The order herewith is the result of many conferences with the special guardian and the attorneys for the petitioner. A previous memorandum (Jan. 27, 1976) explained the conflict of interest which precluded the appointment of the petitioner as sole conservator. The reports of the special guardian and the hearing held by the court confirmed the necessity for the appointment of a qualified third-party attorney to act with the petitioner as coconservators.

There was request for the appointment of a bank as the conservator. A bank was appointed in one instance (Matter of Schnelle, 74 Misc 2d 226),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Appointment of a Conservator of the Property of SchnelleNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In re the Estate of BauerNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re the Appointment of a Conservator of the Property of MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API