Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hoey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a companion suit to Simon v. Hoey, D.C., 88 F.Supp. 754. There are certain additional facts to be considered in this case.

Selina C. Cornish, who was the residuary legatee named in the will of her husband, Edward J. Cornish, died on May 18, 1938, about two weeks after his death. She left a will dated May 15, 1936, and two codicils dated .December 17, 1936 and May 18, 1938. By the second codicil to her will she devised all the property and its proceeds to which she was or might be entitled under the will of her husband to the persons surviving her who would have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fred M. Carter and the Chase National Bank of the City of New York, Etc. v. Jane M. Hoey, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API