Legal Opinion

Salsbury v. KAPKA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 18, 2010No. 4D08-3105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether an all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) is a “dangerous instrumentality” under Florida’s tort law. Because the trial court did not compile an adequate factual record, we cannot reach this issue. Instead, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

The dangerous instrumentality doctrine “imposes strict vicarious liability upon the owner of a motor vehicle who voluntarily entrusts that motor vehicle to an individual whose negligent operation causes damage to another.” Aurbach v. Gallina, 753 So.2d 60, 62 (Fla.2000).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Aurbach v. GallinaSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Meister v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Burch v. Sun State Ford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Harding v. Allen-Laux, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Florida Materials Inc. v. KushermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Roman v. BogleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. JAMES RANDOLPH HARRIS v. SUNBELT RENTALS, INC., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  4. Salsbury v. Griffin Road 345 Property Owner's Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API