Zeitz v. Foley
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, Justice.
The judgment in favor of appellee is for $5,000 upon a promissory note. The appellant defended on the ground of illegal consideration and, upon the appeal, is insisting inter alia that the court should have peremptorily instructed a verdict in his favor and that the evidence does not support the verdict.
At the time of the transaction in question, appellee owned and operated a restaurant on Frankfort Avenue in Louisville, Kentucky. The restaurant had not been profitable and he had listed it with a real estate agency for sale. As a means of supplementing the legitimate income of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ashford v. MaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cumberland Valley Contractors, Inc. v. Bell County Coal Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Wallace Hardware Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Bill Abrams, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hodgkiss-WarrickKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.