Curtis v. City of Redmond
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Kevin S. Curtis appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants City of Redmond, Oregon, and Michael Patterson in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and breach of contract suit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I. Curtis’ Claims Against Patterson
A. Curtis’ Property Interest Claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Procedural due process protections extend only to those property interests created by an “independent source, such as state law.” Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Lawson…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Long v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Brady v. GebbieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.