Burke v. Welo
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuace, J.
This is an appeal from- a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $369.15, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The facts in the case necessary to be stated follow: Plaintiff is a lawyer who at one time resided at or near Yelva, and who did some farming on the side, and defendant was engaged in the merchandize and farm implement business at Yelva. Plaintiff as an attorney rendered certain services for T. Welo, and the Yelva Implement Company, the charges for which, it is claimed, were entered in plaintiffs…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Erenfeld v. ErenfeldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Erenfeld v. ErenfeldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972