Lehrenkrauss v. Bonnell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, the Borough Bank of Brooklyn, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special-Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 21st day of January, 1910, confirming the report of a referee in surplus money proceedings, with notice of an intention to bring up for review an order entered on the 18th day of August, 1909, and also an order entered on the 13tli day of December, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
The record discloses the following facts: In October, 1907, the defendant Bonnell was indebted to the Borough Bank of Brooklyn upon discounted paper iii an amount exceeding. $4,000. In that month the bank, suspended payment and went into the hands of temporary receivers, who continued in charge for a time, when they were discharged and the bank resumed .business. During November and December, 1907, and January, 1908, the receivers and vice-president of the bank endeavored to get Bonnell to pay, reduce or secure his indebtedness. On February 3, 1908, the whole of said indebtedness…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Strong v. . SheffieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Starin v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Erickson v. . QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durland v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Frank v. Von BayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Martin v. LangfittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937