Legal Opinion

United States v. Waldin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 15625PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

Section 4047(e) (10) of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 U.S.C., provides: “Every officer or agent appointed and acting under the authority of any revenue law of the United States—

“Who demands, or accepts, or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, as payment or gift, or otherwise, any sum of money * * * for the compromise, adjustment, or settlement of any charge or complaint for any violation or alleged violation of law, except as expressly authorized by law so to do — shall be dismissed from office, shall be fined not less than $1,000 nor more than $5,000, and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest T. WaldinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. WaldinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. United States v. WaldinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Eva C. Temple, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Eva C. Temple, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API