Legal Opinion
Shoshone-Bannock v. Kempthorne
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2002-0254Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 02-0254 (TFH) v. DAVID BERNHARD, Acting Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ (“the Tribes”) Motion for Clarification of the Settlement Agreement that the Tribes signed with the United States in 2012, [ECF No. 90], along with their Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement, [ECF No. 103]. The United States opposes the motions. [ECF Nos. 95 & 104]. I. Background The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nrm Corporation v. Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Segar v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Charter Oil Company v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Nehmer v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.