Legal Opinion

State v. Quinnild

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1950No. 35,123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order of the district court denying him a new trial after his conviction under an information charging him with carnal knowledge and sodomy in connection with a male child under the age of 16 years.

The testimony, which was uncontradicted, showed the following: The complaining witness, a boy aged 13 years at the time involved, was working as a laborer at Moorhead with his father’s construction crew. He lived in a bunkhouse with the other members of the crew adjacent to a housing development project on which the crew was engaged. The boy’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WithrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Baker v. Connolly Cartage Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Baney v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API