Legal Opinion
Saphir v. Kruse
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendants move for an order changing- "the place of trial of this action from the County of of New York to the County of Westchester.
In their demand, duly served, for a change of venue, the defendants ask that the ‘ ‘ place of trial of this action be changed from the County of New York to the proper county, to wit, the County of Westchester. Said change is demanded upon the ground that the convenience of material witnesses and. the ends of justice will be promoted by such change.” The plaintiff failed to consent to such change (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 146). The defendants thereupon moved…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Iron National Bank v. DolgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Rieger v. Pulaski Glove Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Seafir v. ShuttsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Carnes v. ZanghiNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Cramer v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koschak v. Gates Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996