Legal Opinion
Gregory Poe v. Missing Persons, Dale Bozzio, Steven Brooks, Capitol Records, Inc., Capitol Industries-Emi Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1984No. 83-6132PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Gregory Poe appeals from the order of the district court granting the appellees’ motion for a summary judgment on Poe’s claim of copyright infringement and violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Poe also seeks reversal of the dismissal of all pendent state claims.
I
We must decide whether the evidence submitted by the parties on the motion for a summary judgment raised a genuine issue of material fact. We have concluded that the evidence presented to the district court reveals that there is a disputed issue of material fact as to whether “Aquatint No. 5” is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fabrica Incorporated, a Corporation v. El Dorado Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Norris Industries, Inc. v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation and David L. Ladd, Register of CopyrightsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Cliff May v. Morganelli-Heumann & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Saxony Products, Inc. v. Guerlain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Gay Toys, Inc. v. Buddy L CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Direct Technologies, LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Inhale, Inc. v. Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Galiano v. Harrah's Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. Cinderella Divine, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Leicester v. Warner Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.