Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Doing Business as Supreme Auto Sales, Robert T. Spano. United States of America v. Robert T. Spano, Parkside Motors

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1994No. 93-1538PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota quashing a grand jury subpoena duces tecum directed to a sole proprietor, requesting records required to be maintained under federal and state law. For reversal, the government argues that the district court erred in failing to apply the required records exception to the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled testimonial self-incrimination. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the order of the district court and remand the ease to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. William Smith v. John Richert, Judge, Pulaski Circuit Court Pamela Carter, Attorney General, State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In re Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. State v. GomesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS, NO. 4-10Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API