Legal Opinion

Street v. Nat. Newark & Essex Bank

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 7, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

121 N.J. Super. 586 (1972)

298 A.2d 289

ROBERT E. STREET, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

NATIONAL NEWARK & ESSEX BANK, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided December 7, 1972.

John F. Richardson (Richard T. Ludwig, of counsel on the brief), attorney for Plaintiffs.

William R. Beilig, attorney for Defendant.

KIMMELMAN, J.S.C.

By this summary action the life income beneficiary and two remaindermen of a testamentary trust seek to accelerate and thereby terminate the trust. They contend that the class of remaindermen who are the issue of the life beneficiary has been effectively closed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bosler EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. In Re Estate of RansomNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. The Trenton Banking Co. v. HawleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. In Re Bassett EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  5. Sevel v. SwarzmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API