State v. Hood
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Justice.
This is a companion case to State v. Snodgrass, 346 N.W.2d 472 (Iowa 1984), which we file today. Both cases involve the same facts and same joint trial. Defendant Michael L. Hood contends, as did his codefendant Sherryl Snodgrass, that the trial court abused its discretion under Iowa R.Crim.P. 6(4)(b) in refusing to sever the trials of these two codefendants, thereby resulting in a denial of each defendant’s *483due process right to a fair trial. In Snod-grass we determine the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Snodgrass’ motions to sever her trial. For the reasons…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HamannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State Of Iowa Vs. Calvin Clarence Nelson, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State v. HulbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State v. RothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.