Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Scribner, II

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2016No. 14-11031PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant Donald Raymond Scribner, II, filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to vacate his conviction and sentence on the ground that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Scribner asserted that his trial counsel failed to notify him of a sentencing enhancement that ultimately increased his sentence. Scribner argued that, but for this failure, he would have accepted a plea agreement with the government and received a reduced sentence. A magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on Scribner’s petition and, after hearing testimony, issued a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Bernard Cullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Lauro Valdez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Melvin KnightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. Matt Banks v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Howard Gregg Diamond v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2026
  5. Madrid-Martinez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API