Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur B. Koontz and Mazie W. Koontz, His Wife

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1955No. 6982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The question presented by this appeal is the same as that decided by this court in Hofferbert v. Marshall, 4 Cir., 200 F.2d 648, viz.: Do the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1948, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 12(d), 51(b), 107(a), permitting the splitting of income in a return by husband and wife apply to an item of long term income earned by the husband over a period of years? We are satisfied that the answer given to that question in Hofferbert v. Marshall is the correct one. See also the decisions of the Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in C. I. R. v. Stockly, 221 F.2d 745, and of the Tax Court in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hofferbert v. Marshall Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. Stockly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ayres J. Stockly and Esther W. StocklyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  4. Mahler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John E. McClure and Helen M. McClure v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API