Legal Opinion · Dissent

Satenstein v. Satenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1965Published

1Dissent

Stbtjer, J. (dissenting).

The par tito were married in 1950. They separated pursuant to a separation agreement in 1954. In 1964, defendant husband instituted an action for divorce in Nevada. Plaintiff did not appear in that action and instead instituted this action to enjoin the Nevada action and for a judgment declaring the validity of the marriage. Application for a temporary injunction was made, but denied as academic because the divorce decree was granted in Nevada before the return day of the motion. Defendant answered in this action, and moved for summary judgment on the strength of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Satenstein v. SatensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kletter v. KletterNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wayne v. WayneNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Anolick v. AnolickNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wilson v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API