Fitger v. Alger, Smith & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in ejectment in the district court for Carlton county. The case was tried before Fesler, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action in ejectment tried to a jury. There was a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff relies upon a mortgage foreclosure sale made on March 12, 1894. The defendants do not rely upon title in themselves, though they claim by adverse possession in their pleadings. They assert a lack of title in the plaintiff as an actual defense. The only defendant necessary to mention is the defendant Oswell. He is the one in possession and his codefendant appearing is a judgment creditor.
*522It is claimed by tbe defendant that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- St. Paul Division No. 1 v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Casserly v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Casey v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Risch v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pomroy v. BeattieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Skartum v. KochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Fuller v. Mohawk Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Hammon v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Hutchinson v. ChildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.