Legal Opinion

Mirjafari v. Cohn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 16, 2010No. 38 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

Petitioners, Maziar Mirjafari and Seyed Mehran Mirjafari (“the Mirjafaris”), owners of the investment property at issue in this case, noted exceptions to a foreclosure sale of the property, instituted by Respondents/Trustees (“the Trustees”),1 to a third-party purchaser, Respondent/Intervenor, JSG Campus Hills LLC (“JSG”). The Mirjafaris’ exceptions found no favor in the Circuit Court for Harford County and they appealed. The Court of Special Appeals dismissed as moot the Mirjafaris’ appeal based on their failure to file a *478supersedeas bond.2 See Maryland Rules 8-4223 and 8-4284…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Westpark, Inc. v. Seaton Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. City of Hagerstown v. Long Meadow Shopping CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Sawyer v. NovakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Baltrotsky v. KuglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Leisure Campground & Country Club Ltd. Partnership v. Leisure EstatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julian v. BuonassissiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Julian v. BuonassissiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Mirjafari v. CohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API