Legal Opinion

Day & Night Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1969No. 5618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*228OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

The issue is whether a contractor’s surety bond given pursuant to NRS ch. 624 affords protection to a supplier of materials. The district court ruled that it does not and upon appropriate motion dismissed the supplier’s complaint. That court ruled correctly.

1. Just last year we indicated, without deciding the point, that a supplier of materials is not protected by a contractor’s surety bond. Garff v. J. R. Bradley Company, 84 Nev. 79, 436 P.2d 428, 430 (1968). We there distinguished our prior opinion in Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service, 82 Nev. 148, 413…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service Supply Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Garff v. JR Bradley CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balboa Insurance Co. v. Southern Distributors Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Boswell v. Insurance Company of North AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Day & Night Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust v. Fabel Concrete, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2001
  5. U.S. for the use and benefit of Complete Demo Services v. Multi-Corp Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API