Legal Opinion

State v. Antonucci

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 1991No. 91-1798PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

In its petition for writ of common law certiorari the State asks this court to quash two orders of the trial court which respectively (1) continue a criminal case against the respondent for one year, and (2) continue the same case until the conclusion of a related civil case, with all discovery proceedings in the criminal case being stayed for six (6) months. We find that the second order, apparently entered sua sponte, without a hearing, superseded the first order, which had been entered about ten days earlier, but in any case we hold that either order represents a departure…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DiamondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Outdoor Resorts at Orlando v. Hotz Man. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Klein v. Royale Group, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Higgins v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Kerben v. Intercontinental BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Smith v. M. ST. VILDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. SUPER PRODUCTS, LLC v. INTRACOASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Doolittle v. ShumerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API