Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether defendant was placed in double jeopardy in violation of sec. 8, art. I, Wisconsin constitution, 1 when he pleaded guilty a second time to the three Dane county charges.

Defendant contends that jeopardy attached when he initially pleaded guilty to the three Dane county counts, and this plea was accepted by the court. This is a correct interpretation of the law. The general rule, adhered to by this court, is that jeopardy attaches the moment a plea of guilty is accepted by the court. 2 Defendant, however, further maintains he was again placed in jeopardy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Markiewicz v. BlackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. State v. SchmearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Belter v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. SturdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. State v. Parish & NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PettyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KeltyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Salters v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API