Legal Opinion

Kelly v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1943No. 10426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Harry C. Kelly, has requested the court to appoint an attorney to represent him on his appeal in forma pauperis .from a denial of his motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence. The contentions he makes upon this appeal are the same made in his application for writ of habeas corpus, which was denied by the trial court, and the order of denial affirmed in this court in Kelly v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 793. In that action he was represented by counsel appointed by the lower court who also appeared upon appeal in this court.

The appellant has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Richard Lee Gilpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Kelly v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API