Legal Opinion

Drollinger v. McCurdy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment as to appellant McCurdy reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint, as to him, dismissed, with costs. Defendant Rhodes, with whom appellant McCurdy left an automobile to be repaired, was an independent contractor. (Thorn v. Clark, 188 App. Div. 411.) The injuries sustained by respondent occurred while such contractor was giving appellant’s automobile a road test. The owner of the car is not liable under the common law. Section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was passed to “ make the owner liable for the negligence of a person to whom he loaned the car in connection with its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Thorn v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. PartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Jorgensen v. JaegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Jorgensen v. JaegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API