Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Yoder

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 551Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Van der Voort, J.:

I respectfully dissent. While I agree with the position of the Court, as expressed in the Opinion Per Curiam, that consideration of a motion for arrest of judgment must be based on the record as a whole, I conclude that the Order should be reversed on substantive grounds.

The record shows that appellee at first informed the investigating troopers that they could search the vehicle only with a search warrant. Appellee and one other were riding in a car which the State Police stopped for a violation of The Vehicle Code. Smelling marijuana, seeing smoke…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. BoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Rogers v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API