Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Rousseau

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1980No. 15667, 15668 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craven

The plaintiff is appealing from a jury verdict finding for the defendant and against the plaintiff in a personal injury case arising out of a two-car collision. At the plaintiff’s trial, her counsel, James Walker, was found to be in direct contempt of court and was fined *350. Walker appeals the finding of contempt. The two appeals have been consolidated.

In addition to plaintiff’s counsel’s appeal of the trial court’s order finding him in contempt, this appeal presents us with the following issues: (1) Whether the plaintiff was prejudiced by the trial court’s ruling on the plaintiff’s objections…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hale v. CravensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. Conner v. McGrewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Fincham v. CooneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Wise v. HayungaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rush v. HamdyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Findley v. Blinken (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. In Re Johns-Manville CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API