Da Via v. St. Denis
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. McLaughlin, J.
Due process considerations take precedence over mere administrative convenience. The court may not entertain a petition to modify an existing support order by termination simply to accommodate the administrative needs of the support collection unit. Both of the original parties to the support order are entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Nor will the court fritter away scarce judicial resources by making redundant orders to satisfy administrative needs.1 (See Entwistle v Entwistle, 61 AD2d 380; Barr, *751Separate But Subservient: Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Entwistle v. EntwistleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Mouscardy v. MouscardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Fish v. HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Walker v. BuscagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooks v. WillieNew York Family Court · 1983