Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. MacKey v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 6, 1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This cause has been argued and submitted a second time. On the original hearing an opinion was prepared which contains a statement of facts adequate for an understanding of the legal questions' involved-. The statement follows:

“Relator has instituted in this court a mandamus proceeding to compel the Superintendent of Insurance to issue a license to him as an insurance broker. The authority thus sought is conferred by the following statute:- « .

“ ‘Whoever; for compensation, acts or aids in any manner in negotiating contracts of insurance or reinsurance, or placing risks or effecting insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. City of Monticello v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Samuels v. CouzensMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri State Life Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Priest v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. KoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API