Legal Opinion
Ronald Masters v. Daniel International Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1990No. 88-1345PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant Ron Masters brought this action for retaliatory discharge in the district court alleging that his former employer appellee Daniel International Corporation (“Daniel”) terminated him for having reported safety related concerns to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”).
This appeal is from a decision of the district court dismissing Masters’ claim on the basis that the claim was preempted by Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act 42 U.S.C. § 5851.
The facts as alleged by Masters are that on February 2,1984 he notified the NRC of his safety related concerns about work he was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wheeler v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Lansalot A. Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Richard D. Norris v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Chrisman v. Philips Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronald Masters v. Daniel International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Ackison v. Detroit Edison Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990