Legal Opinion

Sardo v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 16, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The facts in this case are as follows: Thomas Sardo, the complainant, went to his broker, Mr. Lederer, and told him he wanted to insure his money and jewelry. Lederer then took him to Mr. Newman, a soliciting agent of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, the defendant. They told Newman that they wanted a policy of insurance on the money and jewelry of the complainant. Newman said he would communicate with his company in Newark and find out what could be done, because he had no authority himself to write a policy. Newman then sent a written application to the office of the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunston Lithograph Co. v. BorgoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Giammares v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Radwanski v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  4. Commercial Assurance Co. v. New Jersey Rubber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spencer v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API