Legal Opinion

In re Hirschfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold B. Beeler, J.

The People move by order to show cause for a hearing to determine whether this respondent should be found guilty of criminal contempt pursuant to Judiciary Law § 750 (A) (3) in connection with the placement of advertisements in contravention of an order filed by this court on September 22, 1999, prohibiting all parties from making extrajudicial statements regarding the subject matter of the criminal solicitation charges then being tried in the Supreme Court of New York County. Respondent submits two affirmations in opposition which seek various types of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API